Papers › Causal predictive inference and target trial emulation
Causal predictive inference and target trial emulation
Andrew Yiu, Edwin Fong, Stephen Walker, Chris Holmes
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Causal inference from observational data can be viewed as a missing data problem arising from a hypothetical population-scale randomized trial matched to the observational study. This links a target trial protocol with a corresponding generative predictive model for inference, providing a complete framework for transparent communication of causal assumptions and statistical uncertainty on treatment effects, without the need for counterfactuals. The intuitive foundation for the work is that a whole population randomized trial would provide answers to any observable causal question with certainty. Thus, our fundamental problem of causal inference is the missingness of the hypothetical target trial data, which we solve through repeated imputation from a generative predictive model conditioned on the observational data. Causal assumptions map to intuitive conditions on the transportability of predictive models across populations and conditions. We demonstrate our approach on a real data application to studying the effects of maternal smoking on birthweights using extensions of Bayesian additive regression trees and inverse probability weighting.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections