Papers › Can we use Common Voice to train a Multi-Speaker TTS system?
Can we use Common Voice to train a Multi-Speaker TTS system?
Sewade Ogun, Vincent Colotte, Emmanuel Vincent
Training of multi-speaker text-to-speech (TTS) systems relies on curated datasets based on high-quality recordings or audiobooks. Such datasets often lack speaker diversity and are expensive to collect. As an alternative, recent studies have leveraged the availability of large, crowdsourced automatic speech recognition (ASR) datasets. A major problem with such datasets is the presence of noisy and/or distorted samples, which degrade TTS quality. In this paper, we propose to automatically select high-quality training samples using a non-intrusive mean opinion score (MOS) estimator, WV-MOS. We show the viability of this approach for training a multi-speaker GlowTTS model on the Common Voice English dataset. Our approach improves the overall quality of generated utterances by 1.26 MOS point with respect to training on all the samples and by 0.35 MOS point with respect to training on the LibriTTS dataset. This opens the door to automatic TTS dataset curation for a wider range of languages.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2210.06370")
Code
Syntology Ran 1 of 10 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 9 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 10 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
10 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 9 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from ogunlao/glowtts_stdp. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
70a7614b3b3eb41f · report
63e4e54ac1c74e23 · report
7d5db48ab4981884 · report
d2803ec5ec6424b4 · report
698f219261aabb5e · report
16f423dc8d011455 · report
f559e7146ee2b4ab · report
ba6cafc4d658c14f · report
e85d747983c4f5d8 · report
a41c0f5898c9a01f · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections