Papers › Can a machine learn the outcome of planetary collisions?
Can a machine learn the outcome of planetary collisions?
Diana Valencia, Emaad Paracha, Alan P. Jackson
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Planetary-scale collisions are common during the last stages of formation of solid planets, including the Solar system terrestrial planets. The problem of growing planets has been divided into studying the gravitational interaction of embryos relevant in million year timescales and treated with N-body codes and the collision between objects with a timescale of hours to days and treated with smoothed-particle hydrodynamics. These are now being coupled with simple parameterized models. We set out to investigate if machine learning techniques can offer a better solution by predicting the outcome of collisions which can then be used in N-body simulations. We considered three different supervised machine learning approaches: gradient boosting regression trees, nested models, and gaussian processes. We found that the former produced the best results, and that it was slightly surpassed by ensembling different algorithms. With gaussian processes, we found the regions of parameter space that may yield the most information to machine learning algorithms. Thus, we suggest SPH calculations to focus first on mass ratios above 0.5.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections