Papers › C-P Map: A Novel Evaluation Toolkit for Speaker Verification

C-P Map: A Novel Evaluation Toolkit for Speaker Verification

6 Mar 2022arXiv:2203.02942links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Lantian Li, Di Wang, Wenqiang Du, Dong Wang

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Evaluation trials are used to probe performance of automatic speaker verification (ASV) systems. In spite of the clear importance and impact, evaluation trials have not been seriously treated in research and engineering practice. This paper firstly presents a theoretical analysis on evaluation trials and highlights potential bias with the most popular cross-pairing approach used in trials design. To interpret and settle this problem, we define the concept of trial config and C-P map derived from it. The C-P map measures the performance of an ASV system on various trial configs in a 2-dimensional map. On the map, each location represents a particular trial config and its corresponding color represents the system performance. Experiments conducted on representative ASV systems show that the proposed C-P map offers a powerful evaluation toolkit for ASV performance analysis and comparison. The source code for C-P map has been release at https://gitlab.com/csltstu/sunine.

PaperPDFCode

Code

gitlab.com/csltstu/sunine officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections