Papers › Building Confidence in Deep Generative Protein Design

Building Confidence in Deep Generative Protein Design

27 Nov 2024arXiv:2411.18568archive 2025-07-28

Tianyuan Zheng, Alessandro Rondina, Pietro Liò

Deep generative models show promise for de novo protein design, but their effectiveness within specific protein families remains underexplored. In this study, we evaluate two 3D rigid-body generative methods, score matching and flow matching, to generate monomeric protein backbones in SE(3) space. Our goal is to provide new insights and build confidence in the broader applicability of deep generative models for protein design. The optimal amino acid sequences were predicted from the generated backbones, followed by side-chain homology modeling. Results demonstrated high structural integrity, with conserved key residues aligning with known proteins. Structural phylogenetic analysis shows evolutionary links between the generated samples and their protein family members. Further molecular dynamics simulations and protein-ligand docking confirm the dynamic stability and functional potential of these samples, with ligand binding inducing conformational changes consistent with those in wild-type proteins.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2411.18568")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 5 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run.

By repository: official repository: 5 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

ecburx/proteval officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

5unverified

Licence: 0 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from ecburx/proteval. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

descr ecburx/proteval/notebooks/phylogeny/AFDB_tools.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 74f24a368f6d26e6 · report
filter_plddt ecburx/proteval/notebooks/phylogeny/AFDB_tools.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 8abe09376cd5ef92 · report
qscore ecburx/proteval/src/phylogenetics.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · f61dd45678f57f85 · report
rmsd_matrix ecburx/proteval/src/phylogenetics.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 6f1dcea4d1578ba0 · report
tmalign ecburx/proteval/src/phylogenetics.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 99252bdb43627c5a · report

Tasks

Protein Design

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections