Papers › Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiomics Survival Prediction: Contribution to the BRATS...

Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiomics Survival Prediction: Contribution to the BRATS 2017 Challenge

28 Feb 2018arXiv:1802.10508archive 2025-07-28

Fabian Isensee, Philipp Kickingereder, Wolfgang Wick, Martin Bendszus, Klaus H. Maier-Hein

Quantitative analysis of brain tumors is critical for clinical decision making. While manual segmentation is tedious, time consuming and subjective, this task is at the same time very challenging to solve for automatic segmentation methods. In this paper we present our most recent effort on developing a robust segmentation algorithm in the form of a convolutional neural network. Our network architecture was inspired by the popular U-Net and has been carefully modified to maximize brain tumor segmentation performance. We use a dice loss function to cope with class imbalances and use extensive data augmentation to successfully prevent overfitting. Our method beats the current state of the art on BraTS 2015, is one of the leading methods on the BraTS 2017 validation set (dice scores of 0.896, 0.797 and 0.732 for whole tumor, tumor core and enhancing tumor, respectively) and achieves very good Dice scores on the test set (0.858 for whole, 0.775 for core and 0.647 for enhancing tumor). We furthermore take part in the survival prediction subchallenge by training an ensemble of a random forest regressor and multilayer perceptrons on shape features describing the tumor subregions. Our approach achieves 52.6% accuracy, a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.496 and a mean square error of 209607 on the test set.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections