Papers › Bot Detection in GitHub Repositories

Bot Detection in GitHub Repositories

31 Mar 2022arXiv:2203.16997links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Natarajan Chidambaram, Pooya Rostami Mazrae

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Contemporary social coding platforms like GitHub promote collaborative development. Many open-source software repositories hosted in these platforms use machine accounts (bots) to automate and facilitate a wide range of effort-intensive and repetitive activities. Determining if an account corresponds to a bot or a human contributor is important for socio-technical development analytics, for example, to understand how humans collaborate and interact in the presence of bots, to assess the positive and negative impact of using bots, to identify the top project contributors, to identify potential bus factors, and so on. Our project aims to include the trained machine learning (ML) classifier from the BoDeGHa bot detection tool as a plugin to the GrimoireLab software development analytics platform. In this work, we present the procedure to form a pipeline for retrieving contribution and contributor data using Perceval, distinguishing bots from humans using BoDeGHa, and visualising the results using Kibana.

PaperPDFCode

Code

pooya-rostami/hackathon-21 officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections