Papers › BootsTAP: Bootstrapped Training for Tracking-Any-Point
BootsTAP: Bootstrapped Training for Tracking-Any-Point
Carl Doersch, Pauline Luc, Yi Yang, Dilara Gokay, Skanda Koppula, Ankush Gupta, Joseph Heyward, Ignacio Rocco, Ross Goroshin, João Carreira, Andrew Zisserman
To endow models with greater understanding of physics and motion, it is useful to enable them to perceive how solid surfaces move and deform in real scenes. This can be formalized as Tracking-Any-Point (TAP), which requires the algorithm to track any point on solid surfaces in a video, potentially densely in space and time. Large-scale groundtruth training data for TAP is only available in simulation, which currently has a limited variety of objects and motion. In this work, we demonstrate how large-scale, unlabeled, uncurated real-world data can improve a TAP model with minimal architectural changes, using a selfsupervised student-teacher setup. We demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on the TAP-Vid benchmark surpassing previous results by a wide margin: for example, TAP-Vid-DAVIS performance improves from 61.3% to 67.4%, and TAP-Vid-Kinetics from 57.2% to 62.5%. For visualizations, see our project webpage at https://bootstap.github.io/
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Point Tracking | TAP-Vid-DAVIS | BootsTAPIR | Average Jaccard | 66.2 | #2 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Point Tracking | TAP-Vid-DAVIS | BootsTAPIR | Average PCK | 78.1 | #2 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Point Tracking | TAP-Vid-DAVIS | BootsTAPIR | Occlusion Accuracy | 91 | #2 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Point Tracking | TAP-Vid-Kinetics | BootsTAPIR | Average Jaccard | 61.4 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Point Tracking | TAP-Vid-Kinetics | BootsTAPIR | Average PCK | 74.2 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Point Tracking | TAP-Vid-Kinetics | BootsTAPIR | Occlusion Accuracy | 89.7 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Point Tracking | TAP-Vid-RGB-Stacking | BootsTAPIR | Average Jaccard | 72.4 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Point Tracking | TAP-Vid-RGB-Stacking | BootsTAPIR | Average PCK | 83.1 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Point Tracking | TAP-Vid-RGB-Stacking | BootsTAPIR | Occlusion Accuracy | 91.2 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections