Papers › Boosting Residual Networks with Group Knowledge
Boosting Residual Networks with Group Knowledge
Shengji Tang, Peng Ye, Baopu Li, Weihao Lin, Tao Chen, Tong He, Chong Yu, Wanli Ouyang
Recent research understands the residual networks from a new perspective of the implicit ensemble model. From this view, previous methods such as stochastic depth and stimulative training have further improved the performance of the residual network by sampling and training of its subnets. However, they both use the same supervision for all subnets of different capacities and neglect the valuable knowledge generated by subnets during training. In this manuscript, we mitigate the significant knowledge distillation gap caused by using the same kind of supervision and advocate leveraging the subnets to provide diverse knowledge. Based on this motivation, we propose a group knowledge based training framework for boosting the performance of residual networks. Specifically, we implicitly divide all subnets into hierarchical groups by subnet-in-subnet sampling, aggregate the knowledge of different subnets in each group during training, and exploit upper-level group knowledge to supervise lower-level subnet groups. Meanwhile, We also develop a subnet sampling strategy that naturally samples larger subnets, which are found to be more helpful than smaller subnets in boosting performance for hierarchical groups. Compared with typical subnet training and other methods, our method achieves the best efficiency and performance trade-offs on multiple datasets and network structures. The code is at https://github.com/tsj-001/AAAI24-GKT.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2308.13772")
Code
Syntology Ran 9 of 9 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · honoured contract; 2 ran · violated contract; 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 9 samples from 1 repository, 9 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
9 samples harvested; 9 ran; 2 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from tsj-001/aaai24-gkt. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
5c1da0fe7a052b06 · report
2a80220dabcb742a · report
600ff2c45e0de056 · report
cc07f242a3837d36 · report
f3c67c589b630c22 · report
aa5486a3650902d8 · report
012a56f3a60ed47b · report
c8b5501808912cf3 · report
6ba8cee9f5daea41 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections