Papers › Boosting quantum machine learning models with multi-level combination technique: Pople...
Boosting quantum machine learning models with multi-level combination technique: Pople diagrams revisited
Peter Zaspel, Bing Huang, Helmut Harbrecht, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Inspired by Pople diagrams popular in quantum chemistry, we introduce a hierarchical scheme, based on the multi-level combination (C) technique, to combine various levels of approximations made when calculating molecular energies within quantum chemistry. When combined with quantum machine learning (QML) models, the resulting CQML model is a generalized unified recursive kernel ridge regression which exploits correlations implicitly encoded in training data comprised of multiple levels in multiple dimensions. Here, we have investigated up to three dimensions: Chemical space, basis set, and electron correlation treatment. Numerical results have been obtained for atomization energies of a set of ∼7'000 organic molecules with up to 7 atoms (not counting hydrogens) containing CHONFClS, as well as for ∼6'000 constitutional isomers of C₇H₁₀O₂. CQML learning curves for atomization energies suggest a dramatic reduction in necessary training samples calculated with the most accurate and costly method. In order to generate milli-second estimates of CCSD(T)/cc-pvdz atomization energies with prediction errors reaching chemical accuracy (∼1 kcal/mol), the CQML model requires only ∼100 training instances at CCSD(T)/cc-pvdz level, rather than thousands within conventional QML, while more training molecules are required at lower levels. Our results suggest a possibly favourable trade-off between various hierarchical approximations whose computational cost scales differently with electron number.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections