Papers › Black box meta-learning intrinsic rewards for sparse-reward environments

Black box meta-learning intrinsic rewards for sparse-reward environments

31 Jul 2024arXiv:2407.21546archive 2025-07-28

Octavio Pappalardo, Rodrigo Ramele, Juan Miguel Santos

Despite the successes and progress of deep reinforcement learning over the last decade, several challenges remain that hinder its broader application. Some fundamental aspects to improve include data efficiency, generalization capability, and ability to learn in sparse-reward environments, which often require human-designed dense rewards. Meta-learning has emerged as a promising approach to address these issues by optimizing components of the learning algorithm to meet desired characteristics. Additionally, a different line of work has extensively studied the use of intrinsic rewards to enhance the exploration capabilities of algorithms. This work investigates how meta-learning can improve the training signal received by RL agents. The focus is on meta-learning intrinsic rewards under a framework that doesn't rely on the use of meta-gradients. We analyze and compare this approach to the use of extrinsic rewards and a meta-learned advantage function. The developed algorithms are evaluated on distributions of continuous control tasks with both parametric and non-parametric variations, and with only sparse rewards accessible for the evaluation tasks.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Octavio-Pappalardo/Meta-learning-rewards officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Continuous ControlDeep Reinforcement LearningMeta-Learningcontinuous-control

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Focus

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections