Papers › Bipartite Graph Matching Algorithms for Clean-Clean Entity Resolution: An Empirical Evaluation

Bipartite Graph Matching Algorithms for Clean-Clean Entity Resolution: An Empirical Evaluation

28 Dec 2021arXiv:2112.14030links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

George Papadakis, Vasilis Efthymiou, Emanouil Thanos, Oktie Hassanzadeh

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Entity Resolution (ER) is the task of finding records that refer to the same real-world entities. A common scenario is when entities across two clean sources need to be resolved, which we refer to as Clean-Clean ER. In this paper, we perform an extensive empirical evaluation of 8 bipartite graph matching algorithms that take in as input a bipartite similarity graph and provide as output a set of matched entities. We consider a wide range of matching algorithms, including algorithms that have not previously been applied to ER, or have been evaluated only in other ER settings. We assess the relative performance of the algorithms with respect to accuracy and time efficiency over 10 established, real datasets, from which we extract >700 different similarity graphs. Our results provide insights into the relative performance of these algorithms and guidelines for choosing the best one, depending on the data at hand.

PaperPDFCode

Code

scify/JedAIToolkit officialmentioned in papertf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections