Papers › BiomedGPT: A Generalist Vision-Language Foundation Model for Diverse Biomedical Tasks

BiomedGPT: A Generalist Vision-Language Foundation Model for Diverse Biomedical Tasks

26 May 2023arXiv:2305.17100archive 2025-07-28

Kai Zhang, Rong Zhou, Eashan Adhikarla, Zhiling Yan, Yixin Liu, Jun Yu, Zhengliang Liu, Xun Chen, Brian D. Davison, Hui Ren, Jing Huang, Chen Chen, Yuyin Zhou, Sunyang Fu, Wei Liu, Tianming Liu, Xiang Li, Yong Chen, Lifang He, James Zou, Quanzheng Li, Hongfang Liu, Lichao Sun

Traditional biomedical artificial intelligence (AI) models, designed for specific tasks or modalities, often exhibit limited flexibility in real-world deployment and struggle to utilize holistic information. Generalist AI holds the potential to address these limitations due to its versatility in interpreting different data types and generating tailored outputs for diverse needs. However, existing biomedical generalist AI solutions are typically heavyweight and closed source to researchers, practitioners, and patients. Here, we propose BiomedGPT, the first open-source and lightweight vision-language foundation model, designed as a generalist capable of performing various biomedical tasks. BiomedGPT achieved state-of-the-art results in 16 out of 25 experiments while maintaining a computing-friendly model scale. We also conducted human evaluations to assess the capabilities of BiomedGPT in radiology visual question answering, report generation, and summarization. BiomedGPT exhibits robust prediction ability with a low error rate of 3.8% in question answering, satisfactory performance with an error rate of 8.3% in writing complex radiology reports, and competitive summarization ability with a nearly equivalent preference score to human experts. Our method demonstrates that effective training with diverse data can lead to more practical biomedical AI for improving diagnosis and workflow efficiency.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2305.17100")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 8 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract.

By repository: official repository: 8 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

taokz/biomedgpt officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 1 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
7unverified

Licence: 7 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from taokz/biomedgpt. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

apply_half taokz/biomedgpt/evaluate.py official repository ran · honoured contract fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 357d3a4f0be679d9 · report
construct_rdrop_sample taokz/biomedgpt/criterions/label_smoothed_encouraging_loss.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · e1397e09cb4c249d · report
custom_to_pil taokz/biomedgpt/criterions/clip_scst_loss.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · 01478032e19f9e68 · report
kl_loss taokz/biomedgpt/criterions/label_smoothed_encouraging_loss.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · e7939f8552fd8729 · report
label_smoothed_nll_loss taokz/biomedgpt/criterions/label_smoothed_encouraging_loss.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · cbd8615e3eba731b · report
label_smoothed_nll_loss taokz/biomedgpt/criterions/label_smoothed_cross_entropy.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · cdbc222d0057fb31 · report
load taokz/biomedgpt/models/clip/clip.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · db64af1ba3479e8d · report
scst_loss taokz/biomedgpt/criterions/clip_scst_loss.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · b0d5d75f27b8ce4f · report

Tasks

Image CaptioningMedical Visual Question AnsweringNatural Language InferenceQuestion AnsweringText SummarizationTransfer LearningVisual Question Answering

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Captioning IU X-Ray BiomedGPT CIDEr 36.0 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning Peir Gross BiomedGPT CIDEr 122.7 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning Peir Gross BiomedGPT METEOR 15.4 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning Peir Gross BiomedGPT ROUGE-L 30.2 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Natural Language Inference MedNLI BiomedGPT-B Accuracy 83.83 #6 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Text Summarization MeQSum BiomedGPT RougeL 52.3 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Absolute Position EncodingsAdamAttentionBPEDense ConnectionsDropoutGPT-4Label SmoothingLayer NormalizationLinear LayerMulti-Head AttentionPosition-Wise Feed-Forward LayerResidual ConnectionSoftmaxTransformer

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections