Papers › Binary AGN simulations with radiation pressure reveal a new duty cycle, and a...
Binary AGN simulations with radiation pressure reveal a new duty cycle, and a reduction of gravitational torque, through 'minitori' structures
David J. Williamson, Lars H. Bösch, Sebastian F. Hönig
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We produce the first set of radiation hydrodynamics simulations of binary AGNs at parsec-scale separation in scale-model simulations. We use SPH for hydrodynamics, and raytracing to calculate optical depths and radiation pressure from the two AGNs. We confirm that, without radiation pressure, the sign of gravitational torque is sensitive to the binary parameters, although in one of our two orbital configurations the binary should coalesce in a time-scale of <10⁹ yr. However, radiation pressure quickly destroys the 'minitori' around each SMBH, drastically reducing gravitational torques and accretion, and greatly increasing the coalescence time-scale. Our simulations suggest a new 'minitorus' duty cycle with a time-scale of ~10 binary periods (~10⁶ yr when scaling our models to a total binary mass of 2×10⁷ M_⊙). The growth and blow-out phases of the 'minitori' are of similar time-scales, and thus we expect about half of observed binary SMBHs to be active, in at least one component. The 'minitorus' structure provides asymmetries that could be observed by infrared interferometry.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections