Papers › BigNAS: Scaling Up Neural Architecture Search with Big Single-Stage Models

BigNAS: Scaling Up Neural Architecture Search with Big Single-Stage Models

24 Mar 2020ECCV 2020 8arXiv:2003.11142archive 2025-07-28

Jiahui Yu, Pengchong Jin, Hanxiao Liu, Gabriel Bender, Pieter-Jan Kindermans, Mingxing Tan, Thomas Huang, Xiaodan Song, Ruoming Pang, Quoc Le

Neural architecture search (NAS) has shown promising results discovering models that are both accurate and fast. For NAS, training a one-shot model has become a popular strategy to rank the relative quality of different architectures (child models) using a single set of shared weights. However, while one-shot model weights can effectively rank different network architectures, the absolute accuracies from these shared weights are typically far below those obtained from stand-alone training. To compensate, existing methods assume that the weights must be retrained, finetuned, or otherwise post-processed after the search is completed. These steps significantly increase the compute requirements and complexity of the architecture search and model deployment. In this work, we propose BigNAS, an approach that challenges the conventional wisdom that post-processing of the weights is necessary to get good prediction accuracies. Without extra retraining or post-processing steps, we are able to train a single set of shared weights on ImageNet and use these weights to obtain child models whose sizes range from 200 to 1000 MFLOPs. Our discovered model family, BigNASModels, achieve top-1 accuracies ranging from 76.5% to 80.9%, surpassing state-of-the-art models in this range including EfficientNets and Once-for-All networks without extra retraining or post-processing. We present ablative study and analysis to further understand the proposed BigNASModels.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2003.11142")

Code

Syntology Ran 4 of 4 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 4 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 4 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

GAIA-vision/GAIA-cv mentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

4ran

Licence: 0 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from GAIA-vision/GAIA-cv. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

is_folded GAIA-vision/GAIA-cv/gaiavision/model_space/utils.py community (archive-listed) ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 95141158a20398a4 · report
list2tuple GAIA-vision/GAIA-cv/gaiavision/model_space/utils.py community (archive-listed) ran fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · b2615a87b4ec4ed5 · report
make_divisible GAIA-vision/GAIA-cv/gaiavision/core/ops/dynamic_conv.py community (archive-listed) ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 119e2acf76cf0791 · report
unfold_dict GAIA-vision/GAIA-cv/gaiavision/model_space/utils.py community (archive-listed) ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 58305fb91b0aa4e8 · report

Tasks

Neural Architecture Search

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet BigNASModel-L Accuracy 79.5 #30 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet BigNASModel-L MACs 586M #30 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet BigNASModel-L Params 6.4M #30 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet BigNASModel-L Top-1 Error Rate 20.5 #30 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet BigNASModel-M Accuracy 78.9 #39 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet BigNASModel-M MACs 418M #39 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet BigNASModel-M Params 5.5M #39 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet BigNASModel-M Top-1 Error Rate 21.1 #39 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet BigNASModel-S Accuracy 76.5 #82 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet BigNASModel-S MACs 242M #82 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet BigNASModel-S Params 4.5M #82 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet BigNASModel-S Top-1 Error Rate 23.5 #82 of 135 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections