Papers › Fair Machine Learning under Limited Demographically Labeled Data

Fair Machine Learning under Limited Demographically Labeled Data

3 Jun 2021arXiv:2106.04757archive 2025-07-28

Mustafa Safa Ozdayi, Murat Kantarcioglu, Rishabh Iyer

Research has shown that, machine learning models might inherit and propagate undesired social biases encoded in the data. To address this problem, fair training algorithms are developed. However, most algorithms assume we know demographic/sensitive data features such as gender and race. This assumption falls short in scenarios where collecting demographic information is not feasible due to privacy concerns, and data protection policies. A recent line of work develops fair training methods that can function without any demographic feature on the data, that are collectively referred as Rawlsian methods. Yet, we show in experiments that, Rawlsian methods tend to exhibit relatively high bias. Given this, we look at the middle ground between the previous approaches, and consider a setting where we know the demographic attributes for only a small subset of our data. In such a setting, we design fair training algorithms which exhibit both good utility, and low bias. In particular, we show that our techniques can train models to significantly outperform Rawlsian approaches even when 0.1% of demographic attributes are available in the training data. Furthermore, our main algorithm can accommodate multiple training objectives easily. We expand our main algorithm to achieve robustness to label noise in addition to fairness in the limited demographics setting to highlight that property as well.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from TinfoilHat0/BiFair. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections