Papers › Bias-Free Scalable Gaussian Processes via Randomized Truncations

Bias-Free Scalable Gaussian Processes via Randomized Truncations

12 Feb 2021arXiv:2102.06695archive 2025-07-28

Andres Potapczynski, Luhuan Wu, Dan Biderman, Geoff Pleiss, John P. Cunningham

Scalable Gaussian Process methods are computationally attractive, yet introduce modeling biases that require rigorous study. This paper analyzes two common techniques: early truncated conjugate gradients (CG) and random Fourier features (RFF). We find that both methods introduce a systematic bias on the learned hyperparameters: CG tends to underfit while RFF tends to overfit. We address these issues using randomized truncation estimators that eliminate bias in exchange for increased variance. In the case of RFF, we show that the bias-to-variance conversion is indeed a trade-off: the additional variance proves detrimental to optimization. However, in the case of CG, our unbiased learning procedure meaningfully outperforms its biased counterpart with minimal additional computation.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

cunningham-lab/RTGPS officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Gaussian Processes

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Gaussian Process

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections