Papers › Beyond LLaVA-HD: Diving into High-Resolution Large Multimodal Models

Beyond LLaVA-HD: Diving into High-Resolution Large Multimodal Models

12 Jun 2024arXiv:2406.08487archive 2025-07-28

Yi-Fan Zhang, Qingsong Wen, Chaoyou Fu, Xue Wang, Zhang Zhang, Liang Wang, Rong Jin

Seeing clearly with high resolution is a foundation of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs), which has been proven to be vital for visual perception and reasoning. Existing works usually employ a straightforward resolution upscaling method, where the image consists of global and local branches, with the latter being the sliced image patches but resized to the same resolution as the former. This means that higher resolution requires more local patches, resulting in exorbitant computational expenses, and meanwhile, the dominance of local image tokens may diminish the global context. In this paper, we dive into the problems and propose a new framework as well as an elaborate optimization strategy. Specifically, we extract contextual information from the global view using a mixture of adapters, based on the observation that different adapters excel at different tasks. With regard to local patches, learnable query embeddings are introduced to reduce image tokens, the most important tokens accounting for the user question will be further selected by a similarity-based selector. Our empirical results demonstrate a `less is more' pattern, where \textit{utilizing fewer but more informative local image tokens leads to improved performance}. Besides, a significant challenge lies in the training strategy, as simultaneous end-to-end training of the global mining block and local compression block does not yield optimal results. We thus advocate for an alternating training way, ensuring balanced learning between global and local aspects. Finally, we also introduce a challenging dataset with high requirements for image detail, enhancing the training of the local compression layer. The proposed method, termed LMM with Sophisticated Tasks, Local image compression, and Mixture of global Experts (SliME), achieves leading performance across various benchmarks with only 2 million training data.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2406.08487")

Code

Syntology Ran 10 of 10 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran · fixture could not drive it; 4 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 9 samples from 1 repository, 9 ran; 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

yfzhang114/slime officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

10 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · violated contract
3ran · our draft was wrong
2ran · fixture could not drive it
4ran

Licence: 1 of the 10 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from yfzhang114/slime. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

collate_fn yfzhang114/slime/llava/eval/model_vqa_amber.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 20e4f665698a3d18 · report
evaluate_relaxed_accuracy yfzhang114/slime/llava/eval/model_vqa_chartqa.py official repository ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 6b695143dc1b2b67 · report
get_chunk yfzhang114/slime/llava/eval/model_vqa.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 42a46570620cd9fa · report
is_none yfzhang114/slime/llava/eval/model_vqa_mmbench.py official repository ran · violated contract Apache-2.0 (permissive) · bae18947b56f2be1 · report
relaxed_correctness yfzhang114/slime/llava/eval/model_vqa_chartqa.py official repository ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 3dd635048bda9fb0 · report
resize_and_pad_image yfzhang114/slime/llava/mm_utils.py official repository ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 468eedeba67f1b00 · report
select_best_resolution yfzhang114/slime/llava/mm_utils.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 3999ff487573f32c · report
select_best_resolution_uhd yfzhang114/slime/llava/mm_utils.py official repository ran fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · b3954d72b4333be4 · report
split_list yfzhang114/slime/llava/eval/model_vqa.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 076c252c52cbb161 · report
unpad_image identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted licence of this copy not recorded · 7606525af238fb64 · report

Tasks

Image Compression

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections