Papers › Beyond costs: Mapping Norwegian youth preferences for a more inclusive energy transition
Beyond costs: Mapping Norwegian youth preferences for a more inclusive energy transition
Muhammad Shahzad Javed, Karin Fossheim, Paola Velasco-Herrejón, Nikolai Elias Koop, Matylda N. Guzik, Charles Dana Samuelson, Beate Seibt, Marianne Zeyringer
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Environmental movements and climate strikes have made it apparent that youth feel excluded from the ongoing energy transformation process, highlighting the crucial need for their engagement to achieve a socially accepted transition. This interdisciplinary study focuses on the Norwegian electricity system and involves conducting educational workshops with high school students aged 15 to 16 to ascertain their perspectives towards a net-zero energy system. The workshops were structured into three segments, starting with the dissemination of common knowledge about energy and climate, followed by interactive activities designed to explore and develop an understanding of various aspects of energy transition. Three rounds of questionnaires, administered at distinct time intervals, assessed changes in students' attitudes and socio-techno-economic preferences. Our findings show that 33% of pupils favored exclusively offshore wind as a main energy source, while 35% opted to combine it with solar energy, indicating that over 68% viewed offshore wind as favorable. Although 32% supported some form of land-based wind turbines, there was strong disagreement about wind parks in agricultural, forested, and residential areas. Preferences also exhibited considerable regional variation; solar installations were favored in southern and southeastern Norway, while wind farms were suggested for central and northern regions. Pupils emphasized energy independence, showed reluctance towards demand response, prioritized reducing emissions and preserving biodiversity over minimizing electricity costs. Despite cost-minimization being core to most energy system models, youth deemed it the least important factor, highlighting a disconnect between modeling priorities and their perspectives.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections