Papers › Beyond Attentive Tokens: Incorporating Token Importance and Diversity for Efficient...
Beyond Attentive Tokens: Incorporating Token Importance and Diversity for Efficient Vision Transformers
Sifan Long, Zhen Zhao, Jimin Pi, Shengsheng Wang, Jingdong Wang
Vision transformers have achieved significant improvements on various vision tasks but their quadratic interactions between tokens significantly reduce computational efficiency. Many pruning methods have been proposed to remove redundant tokens for efficient vision transformers recently. However, existing studies mainly focus on the token importance to preserve local attentive tokens but completely ignore the global token diversity. In this paper, we emphasize the cruciality of diverse global semantics and propose an efficient token decoupling and merging method that can jointly consider the token importance and diversity for token pruning. According to the class token attention, we decouple the attentive and inattentive tokens. In addition to preserving the most discriminative local tokens, we merge similar inattentive tokens and match homogeneous attentive tokens to maximize the token diversity. Despite its simplicity, our method obtains a promising trade-off between model complexity and classification accuracy. On DeiT-S, our method reduces the FLOPs by 35% with only a 0.2% accuracy drop. Notably, benefiting from maintaining the token diversity, our method can even improve the accuracy of DeiT-T by 0.1% after reducing its FLOPs by 40%.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (With LV-ViT-S) | BAT | GFLOPs | 4.7 | #6 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (With LV-ViT-S) | BAT | Top 1 Accuracy | 83.1 | #6 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | BAT (70%) | GFLOPs | 3.0 | #16 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | BAT (70%) | Top 1 Accuracy | 79.6 | #16 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | BAT (60%) | GFLOPs | 2.6 | #26 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | BAT (60%) | Top 1 Accuracy | 79.3 | #26 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | BAT (50%) | GFLOPs | 2.3 | #31 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | BAT (50%) | Top 1 Accuracy | 79.0 | #31 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | BAT (40%) | GFLOPs | 2.0 | #34 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | BAT (40%) | Top 1 Accuracy | 78.6 | #34 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | BAT (30%) | GFLOPs | 1.8 | #40 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | BAT (30%) | Top 1 Accuracy | 77.8 | #40 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | BAT (20%) | GFLOPs | 1.6 | #41 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | BAT (20%) | Top 1 Accuracy | 76.4 | #41 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-T) | BAT | GFLOPs | 0.8 | #4 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-T) | BAT | Top 1 Accuracy | 72.3 | #4 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections