Papers › Benchmarking scalability of stream processing frameworks deployed as microservices in the cloud
Benchmarking scalability of stream processing frameworks deployed as microservices in the cloud
Sören Henning, Wilhelm Hasselbring
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Context: The combination of distributed stream processing with microservice architectures is an emerging pattern for building data-intensive software systems. In such systems, stream processing frameworks such as Apache Flink, Apache Kafka Streams, Apache Samza, Hazelcast Jet, or the Apache Beam SDK are used inside microservices to continuously process massive amounts of data in a distributed fashion. While all of these frameworks promote scalability as a core feature, there is only little empirical research evaluating and comparing their scalability. Objective: The goal of this study to obtain evidence about the scalability of state-of-the-art stream processing framework in different execution environments and regarding different scalability dimensions. Method: We benchmark five modern stream processing frameworks regarding their scalability using a systematic method. We conduct over 740 hours of experiments on Kubernetes clusters in the Google cloud and in a private cloud, where we deploy up to 110 simultaneously running microservice instances, which process up to one million messages per second. Results: All benchmarked frameworks exhibit approximately linear scalability as long as sufficient cloud resources are provisioned. However, the frameworks show considerable differences in the rate at which resources have to be added to cope with increasing load. There is no clear superior framework, but the ranking of the frameworks depends on the use case. Using Apache Beam as an abstraction layer still comes at the cost of significantly higher resource requirements regardless of the use case. We observe our results regardless of scaling load on a microservice, scaling the computational work performed inside the microservice, and the selected cloud environment. Moreover, vertical scaling can be a complementary measure to achieve scalability of stream processing frameworks.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections