Papers › Benchmarking Generative AI Models for Deep Learning Test Input Generation

Benchmarking Generative AI Models for Deep Learning Test Input Generation

23 Dec 2024arXiv:2412.17652archive 2025-07-28

Maryam, Matteo Biagiola, Andrea Stocco, Vincenzo Riccio

Test Input Generators (TIGs) are crucial to assess the ability of Deep Learning (DL) image classifiers to provide correct predictions for inputs beyond their training and test sets. Recent advancements in Generative AI (GenAI) models have made them a powerful tool for creating and manipulating synthetic images, although these advancements also imply increased complexity and resource demands for training. In this work, we benchmark and combine different GenAI models with TIGs, assessing their effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of the generated test images, in terms of domain validity and label preservation. We conduct an empirical study involving three different GenAI architectures (VAEs, GANs, Diffusion Models), five classification tasks of increasing complexity, and 364 human evaluations. Our results show that simpler architectures, such as VAEs, are sufficient for less complex datasets like MNIST. However, when dealing with feature-rich datasets, such as ImageNet, more sophisticated architectures like Diffusion Models achieve superior performance by generating a higher number of valid, misclassification-inducing inputs.

PaperPDFCode

Code

maryammaryam877/genai_tigs officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

BenchmarkingDeep Learning

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Diffusion

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections