Papers › Benchmarking and modeling of analog and digital SRAM in-memory computing architectures
Benchmarking and modeling of analog and digital SRAM in-memory computing architectures
Pouya Houshmand, Jiacong Sun, Marian Verhelst
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
In-memory-computing is emerging as an efficient hardware paradigm for deep neural network accelerators at the edge, enabling to break the memory wall and exploit massive computational parallelism. Two design models have surged: analog in-memory-computing (AIMC) and digital in-memory-computing (DIMC), offering a different design space in terms of accuracy, efficiency and dataflow flexibility. This paper targets the fair comparison and benchmarking of both approaches to guide future designs, through a.) an overview of published architectures; b.) an analytical cost model for energy and throughput; c.) scheduling of workloads on a variety of modeled IMC architectures for end-to-end network efficiency analysis, offering valuable workload-hardware co-design insights.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections