Papers › BEDS: Bagging ensemble deep segmentation for nucleus segmentation with testing stage...

BEDS: Bagging ensemble deep segmentation for nucleus segmentation with testing stage stain augmentation

17 Feb 2021arXiv:2102.08990archive 2025-07-28

Xing Li, Haichun Yang, Jiaxin He, Aadarsh Jha, Agnes B. Fogo, Lee E. Wheless, Shilin Zhao, Yuankai Huo

Reducing outcome variance is an essential task in deep learning based medical image analysis. Bootstrap aggregating, also known as bagging, is a canonical ensemble algorithm for aggregating weak learners to become a strong learner. Random forest is one of the most powerful machine learning algorithms before deep learning era, whose superior performance is driven by fitting bagged decision trees (weak learners). Inspired by the random forest technique, we propose a simple bagging ensemble deep segmentation (BEDs) method to train multiple U-Nets with partial training data to segment dense nuclei on pathological images. The contributions of this study are three-fold: (1) developing a self-ensemble learning framework for nucleus segmentation; (2) aggregating testing stage augmentation with self-ensemble learning; and (3) elucidating the idea that self-ensemble and testing stage stain augmentation are complementary strategies for a superior segmentation performance. Implementation Detail: https://github.com/xingli1102/BEDs.

PaperPDFCode

Code

xingli1102/BEDs officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Deep LearningEnsemble LearningMedical Image AnalysisSegmentation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections