Papers › Bayesian search for gravitational wave bursts in pulsar timing array data
Bayesian search for gravitational wave bursts in pulsar timing array data
Bence Bécsy, Neil J. Cornish
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The nanohertz frequency band explored by pulsar timing arrays provides a unique discovery space for gravitational wave signals. In addition to signals from anticipated sources, such as those from supermassive black hole binaries, some previously unimagined sources may emit transient gravitational waves (a.k.a. bursts) with unknown morphology. Unmodeled transients are not currently searched for in this frequency band, and they require different techniques from those currently employed. Possible sources of such gravitational wave bursts in the nanohertz regime are parabolic encounters of supermassive black holes, cosmic string cusps and kinks, or other, as-yet-unknown phenomena. In this paper we present BayesHopperBurst, a Bayesian search algorithm capable of identifying generic gravitational wave bursts by modeling both coherent and incoherent transients as a sum of Morlet-Gabor wavelets. A trans-dimensional Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampler is used to select the number of wavelets best describing the data. We test BayesHopperBurst on various simulated datasets including different combinations of signals and noise transients. Its capability to run on real data is demonstrated by analyzing data of the pulsar B1855+09 from the NANOGrav 9-year dataset. Based on a simulated dataset resembling the NANOGrav 12.5-year data release, we predict that at our most sensitive time-frequency location we will be able to probe gravitational wave bursts with a root-sum-squared amplitude higher than ∼5 ×10⁻¹¹ Hz^(-1/2), which corresponds to ∼40 M_⊙ c² emitted in GWs at a fiducial distance of 100 Mpc.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections