Papers › Bayesian Multinomial Logistic Regression for Numerous Categories
Bayesian Multinomial Logistic Regression for Numerous Categories
Jared D. Fisher, Kyle R. McEvoy
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Bayesian multinomial logistic regression provides a principled, interpretable approach to multiclass classification, but posterior sampling becomes increasingly expensive as the model dimension grows. Prior work has studied scalability in the number of subjects and covariates; in contrast, this paper focuses on how computation changes as the number of outcome categories increases. To improve scalability in settings with numerous categories, we adapt a gamma-augmentation strategy to decouple category-specific coefficient updates, so that each category's coefficients can be updated conditional on a single auxiliary variable per subject, rather than on the full set of other categories' coefficients. Because the resulting coefficient conditionals are non-conjugate, we couple this augmentation with either adaptive Metropolis-Hastings or elliptical slice sampling. Through simulation and a real-data example, we compare effective sample size and effective sampling rate across several standard competitors. We find that the best-performing sampler depends on the dimension and imbalance regime, and that the proposed augmentation provides substantial speedups in scenarios with numerous categories.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections