Papers › Bayesian modeling of spatial ordinal data from health surveys

Bayesian modeling of spatial ordinal data from health surveys

18 Jan 2024arXiv:2401.09994links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Miguel Ángel Beltrán Sánchez, Miguel Ángel Martínez Beneito, Ana Corberán Vallet

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Health surveys allow exploring health indicators that are of great value from a public health point of view and that cannot normally be studied from regular health registries. These indicators are usually coded as ordinal variables and may depend on covariates associated with individuals. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian individual-level model for small-area estimation of survey-based health indicators. A categorical likelihood is used at the first level of the model hierarchy to describe the ordinal data, and spatial dependence among small areas is taken into account by using a conditional autoregressive (CAR) distribution. Post-stratification of the results of the proposed individual-level model allows extrapolating the results to any administrative areal division, even for small areas. We apply this methodology to the analysis of the Health Survey of the Region of Valencia (Spain) of 2016 to describe the geographical distribution of a self-perceived health indicator of interest in this region.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections