Papers › Bayesian item response models for citizen science ecological data
Bayesian item response models for citizen science ecological data
Edgar Santos-Fernandez, Kerrie Mengersen
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
So-called 'citizen science' data elicited from crowds has become increasingly popular in many fields including ecology. However, the quality of this information is being frequently debated by many within the scientific community. Therefore, modern citizen science implementations require measures of the users' proficiency that account for the difficulty of the tasks. We introduce a new methodological framework of item response and linear logistic test models with application to citizen science data used in ecology research. This approach accommodates spatial autocorrelation within the item difficulties and produces relevant ecological measures of species and site-related difficulties, discriminatory power and guessing behavior. These, along with estimates of the subject abilities allow better management of these programs and provide deeper insights. This paper also highlights the fit of item response models to big data via divide-and-conquer. We found that the suggested methods outperform the traditional item response models in terms of RMSE, accuracy, and WAIC based on leave-one-out cross-validation on simulated and empirical data. We present a comprehensive implementation using a case study of species identification in the Serengeti, Tanzania. The R and Stan codes are provided for full reproducibility. Multiple statistical illustrations and visualizations are given which allow practitioners the extrapolation to a wide range of citizen science ecological problems.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections