Papers › Bayesian inference to study a signal with two or more decaying particles in a...

Bayesian inference to study a signal with two or more decaying particles in a non-resonant background

13 Oct 2022arXiv:2210.07358links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Ezequiel Alvarez

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We study the application of a Bayesian method to extract relevant information from data for the case of a signal consisting of two or more decaying particles and its background. The method takes advantage of the dependence that exists in the distributions of the decaying products at the event-by-event level and processes the information for the whole sample to infer the mixture fraction and the relevant parameters for signal and background distributions. The algorithm usually needs a numerical computation of the posterior, which we work out explicitly in a benchmark scenario of a simplified pp→hh →bb̅ γγ search. We perform a posterior predictive check on the results and we show how the signal fraction is correctly extracted from the sample, as well as many parameters in the signal and background distributions. The presented framework could be used for other searches such as pp→ZZ, WW, ZW and pair of Leptoquarks, among many others.

PaperPDFCode

Code

sequi76/bayesian-double-bump-hunting officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections