Papers › Bayesian Hierarchical Modelling of Noisy Gamma Processes: Model Formulation,...
Bayesian Hierarchical Modelling of Noisy Gamma Processes: Model Formulation, Identifiability, Model Fitting, and Extensions to Unit-to-Unit Variability
Ryan Leadbetter, Gabriel Gonzalez Caceres, Aloke Phatak
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The gamma process is a natural model for monotonic degradation processes. In practice, it is desirable to extend the single gamma process to incorporate measurement error and to construct models for the degradation of several nominally identical units. In this paper, we show how these extensions are easily facilitated through the Bayesian hierarchical modelling framework. Following the precepts of the Bayesian statistical workflow, we show the principled construction of a noisy gamma process model. We also reparameterise the gamma process to simplify the specification of priors and make it obvious how the single gamma process model can be extended to include unit-to-unit variability or covariates. We first fit the noisy gamma process model to a single simulated degradation trace. In doing so, we find an identifiability problem between the volatility of the gamma process and the measurement error when there are only a few noisy degradation observations. However, this lack of identifiability can be resolved by including extra information in the analysis through a stronger prior or extra data that informs one of the non-identifiable parameters, or by borrowing information from multiple units. We then explore extensions of the model to account for unit-to-unit variability and demonstrate them using a crack-propagation data set with added measurement error. Lastly, we perform model selection in a fully Bayesian framework by using cross-validation to approximate the expected log probability density of new observation. We also show how failure time distributions with uncertainty intervals can be calculated for new units or units that are currently under test but are yet to fail.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections