Papers › Bandwidth and Wavefront Reduction for Static Variable Ordering in Symbolic Model Checking
Bandwidth and Wavefront Reduction for Static Variable Ordering in Symbolic Model Checking
Jeroen Meijer, Jaco van de Pol
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We demonstrate the applicability of bandwidth and wavefront reduction algorithms to static variable ordering. In symbolic model checking event locality plays a major role in time and memory usage. For example, in Petri nets event locality can be captured by dependency matrices, where nonzero entries indicate whether a transition modifies a place. The quality of event locality has been expressed as a metric called (weighted) event span. The bandwidth of a matrix is a metric indicating the distance of nonzero elements to the diagonal. Wavefront is a metric indicating the degree of nonzeros on one end of the diagonal of the matrix. Bandwidth and wavefront are well studied metrics used in sparse matrix solvers. In this work we prove that span is limited by twice the bandwidth of a matrix. This observation makes bandwidth reduction algorithms useful for obtaining good variable orders. One major issue we address is that the reduction algorithms can only be applied on symmetric matrices, while the dependency matrices are asymmetric. We show that the Sloan algorithm executed on the total graph of the adjacency graph gives the best variable orders. Practically, we demonstrate that our work allows to call standard sparse matrix operations in Boost and ViennaCL, computing very good static variable orders in milliseconds. Future work is promising, because a whole new spectrum of more off-the-shelf algorithms, including metaheuristic ones, become available for variable ordering.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections