Papers › Availability-aware Service Placement Policy in Fog Computing Based on Graph Partitions

Availability-aware Service Placement Policy in Fog Computing Based on Graph Partitions

23 Jan 2024arXiv:2401.12690links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Isaac Lera, Carlos Guerrero, Carlos Juiz

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

This paper presents a policy for service placement of fog applications inspired on complex networks and graph theory. We propose a twofold partition process based on communities for the partition of the fog devices and based on transitive closures for the application services partition. The allocation of the services is performed sequentially by, firstly, mapping applications to device communities and, secondly, mapping service transitive closures to fog devices in the community. The underlying idea is to place as many inter-related services as possible in the most nearby devices to the users. The optimization objectives are the availability of the applications and the Quality of Service (QoS) of the system, measured as the number of requests that are executed before the application deadlines. We compared our solution with an Integer Linear Programming approach, and the simulation results showed that our proposal obtains higher QoS and availability when fails in the nodes are considered.

PaperPDFCode

Code

acsicuib/YAFS officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections