Papers › AutoWeird: Weird Translational Scoring Function Identified by Random Search

AutoWeird: Weird Translational Scoring Function Identified by Random Search

24 Jul 2022arXiv:2207.11673archive 2025-07-28

Hansi Yang, Yongqi Zhang, Quanming Yao

Scoring function (SF) measures the plausibility of triplets in knowledge graphs. Different scoring functions can lead to huge differences in link prediction performances on different knowledge graphs. In this report, we describe a weird scoring function found by random search on the open graph benchmark (OGB). This scoring function, called AutoWeird, only uses tail entity and relation in a triplet to compute its plausibility score. Experimental results show that AutoWeird achieves top-1 performance on ogbl-wikikg2 data set, but has much worse performance than other methods on ogbl-biokg data set. By analyzing the tail entity distribution and evaluation protocol of these two data sets, we attribute the unexpected success of AutoWeird on ogbl-wikikg2 to inappropriate evaluation and concentrated tail entity distribution. Such results may motivate further research on how to accurately evaluate the performance of different link prediction methods for knowledge graphs.

PaperPDF

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

AttributeKnowledge GraphsLink Prediction

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Link Property Prediction ogbl-wikikg2 AutoWeird Ext. data No #2 of 30 Archive leaderboard report
Link Property Prediction ogbl-wikikg2 AutoWeird Number of params 19215402 #2 of 30 Archive leaderboard report
Link Property Prediction ogbl-wikikg2 AutoWeird Test MRR 0.7353 ± 0.0006 #2 of 30 Archive leaderboard report
Link Property Prediction ogbl-wikikg2 AutoWeird Validation MRR 0.7362 ± 0.0006 #2 of 30 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Random Search

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections