Papers › Automatic Evaluation of Excavator Operators using Learned Reward Functions

Automatic Evaluation of Excavator Operators using Learned Reward Functions

15 Nov 2022arXiv:2211.07941archive 2025-07-28

Pranav Agarwal, Marek Teichmann, Sheldon Andrews, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou

Training novice users to operate an excavator for learning different skills requires the presence of expert teachers. Considering the complexity of the problem, it is comparatively expensive to find skilled experts as the process is time-consuming and requires precise focus. Moreover, since humans tend to be biased, the evaluation process is noisy and will lead to high variance in the final score of different operators with similar skills. In this work, we address these issues and propose a novel strategy for the automatic evaluation of excavator operators. We take into account the internal dynamics of the excavator and the safety criterion at every time step to evaluate the performance. To further validate our approach, we use this score prediction model as a source of reward for a reinforcement learning agent to learn the task of maneuvering an excavator in a simulated environment that closely replicates the real-world dynamics. For a policy learned using these external reward prediction models, our results demonstrate safer solutions following the required dynamic constraints when compared to policy trained with task-based reward functions only, making it one step closer to real-life adoption. For future research, we release our codebase at https://github.com/pranavAL/InvRL_Auto-Evaluate and video results https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jR1otOAu8zrY8mkhUOUZW9jkBOAKK71Z/view?usp=share_link .

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 3 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from pranaval/invrl_auto-evaluate. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections