Papers › Automated discovery of superconducting circuits and its application to 4-local coupler design
Automated discovery of superconducting circuits and its application to 4-local coupler design
Tim Menke, Florian Häse, Simon Gustavsson, Andrew J. Kerman, William D. Oliver, Alán Aspuru-Guzik
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Superconducting circuits have emerged as a promising platform to build quantum processors. The challenge of designing a circuit is to compromise between realizing a set of performance metrics and reducing circuit complexity and noise sensitivity. At the same time, one needs to explore a large design space, and computational approaches often yield long simulation times. Here we automate the circuit design task using SCILLA, a software for automated discovery of superconducting circuits. SCILLA performs a parallelized, closed-loop optimization to design circuit diagrams that match pre-defined properties such as spectral features and noise sensitivities. We employ it to discover 4-local couplers for superconducting flux qubits and identify a circuit that outperforms an existing proposal with similar circuit structure in terms of coupling strength and noise resilience for experimentally accessible parameters. This work demonstrates how automated discovery can facilitate the design of complex circuit architectures for quantum information processing.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections