Papers › AutoFreeze: Automatically Freezing Model Blocks to Accelerate Fine-tuning

AutoFreeze: Automatically Freezing Model Blocks to Accelerate Fine-tuning

2 Feb 2021arXiv:2102.01386archive 2025-07-28

YuHan Liu, Saurabh Agarwal, Shivaram Venkataraman

With the rapid adoption of machine learning (ML), a number of domains now use the approach of fine tuning models which were pre-trained on a large corpus of data. However, our experiments show that even fine-tuning on models like BERT can take many hours even when using modern accelerators like GPUs. While prior work proposes limiting the number of layers that are fine-tuned, e.g., freezing all layers but the last layer, we find that such static approaches lead to reduced accuracy. We propose, AutoFreeze, a system that uses an adaptive approach to choose which layers are trained and show how this can accelerate model fine-tuning while preserving accuracy. We also develop mechanisms to enable efficient caching of intermediate activations which can reduce the forward computation time when performing fine-tuning. We extend AutoFreeze to perform distributed fine-tuning and design two execution modes that minimize cost and running time respectively. Our evaluation on ten NLP tasks shows that AutoFreeze, with caching enabled, can improve fine-tuning on a single GPU by up to 2.55x. On a 64 GPU cluster, for fine-tuning on the AG's news dataset, AutoFreeze is able to achieve up to 4.38x speedup when optimizing for end-to-end training time and 5.03x reduction in total cost when optimizing for efficiency, without affecting model accuracy.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2102.01386")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 1 code samples harvested from 0 repositories linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract.

By repository: 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

uw-mad-dash/AutoFreeze officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract

Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

accuracy identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · honoured contract fingerprinted licence of this copy not recorded · eb725d5794b15f6b · report

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

AdamAttentionAttention DropoutBERTDense ConnectionsDropoutLayer NormalizationLinear LayerLinear Warmup With Linear DecayMulti-Head AttentionResidual ConnectionSoftmaxWeight DecayWordPiece

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections