Papers › AutoPSV: Automated Process-Supervised Verifier

AutoPSV: Automated Process-Supervised Verifier

27 May 2024arXiv:2405.16802archive 2025-07-28

Jianqiao Lu, Zhiyang Dou, Hongru Wang, Zeyu Cao, Jianbo Dai, Yingjia Wan, Zhijiang Guo

In this work, we propose a novel method named \textbf{Auto}mated \textbf{P}rocess-\textbf{S}upervised \textbf{V}erifier (\textbf{\textsc{AutoPSV}}) to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by automatically annotating the reasoning steps. \textsc{AutoPSV} begins by training a verification model on the correctness of final answers, enabling it to generate automatic process annotations. This verification model assigns a confidence score to each reasoning step, indicating the probability of arriving at the correct final answer from that point onward. We detect relative changes in the verification's confidence scores across reasoning steps to automatically annotate the reasoning process, enabling error detection even in scenarios where ground truth answers are unavailable. This alleviates the need for numerous manual annotations or the high computational costs associated with model-induced annotation approaches. We experimentally validate that the step-level confidence changes learned by the verification model trained on the final answer correctness can effectively identify errors in the reasoning steps. We demonstrate that the verification model, when trained on process annotations generated by \textsc{AutoPSV}, exhibits improved performance in selecting correct answers from multiple LLM-generated outputs. Notably, we achieve substantial improvements across five datasets in mathematics and commonsense reasoning. The source code of \textsc{AutoPSV} is available at \url{https://github.com/rookie-joe/AutoPSV}.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2405.16802")

Code

Syntology Ran 8 of 11 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 5 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 11 samples from 2 repositories, 8 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

rookie-joe/autocv officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
rookie-joe/autopsv officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 8 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
1ran · fixture could not drive it
5ran
3unverified

Licence: 11 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Verifier rookie-joe/autopsv/utils/process_verifier_models.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 31531bb131326426 · report
create_train_dataloader rookie-joe/autocv/utils/verfier_datasets.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 49640af61a6d3492 · report
get_dataset_examples rookie-joe/autocv/utils/verfier_datasets.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 69664c2b879ea002 · report
load_tokenizer rookie-joe/autocv/data_annotation.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 17243183193565ff · report
mse_loss_with_mask rookie-joe/autopsv/utils/process_verifier_models.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · dfef91c8dfd2a1ee · report
read_jsonl rookie-joe/autocv/utils/verfier_datasets.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · c409d17fa33773fa · report
split_string_list rookie-joe/AutoPSV/data_annotation.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 8fd49b81e935073b · report
split_token_list rookie-joe/AutoPSV/data_annotation.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 3f4f58ae7ef13d89 · report
VerifierModelOutput rookie-joe/autopsv/utils/process_verifier_models.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · c8b43628f651b52e · report
build_verifier_from_osv rookie-joe/autocv/utils/process_verifier_models.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 100d6596edff1631 · report
build_verifier_from_scratch rookie-joe/autocv/utils/process_verifier_models.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · e460ed999d4fa5b0 · report

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections