Papers › AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Strategies From Data
AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Strategies From Data
Ekin D. Cubuk, Barret Zoph, Dandelion Mane, Vijay Vasudevan, Quoc V. Le
Data augmentation is an effective technique for improving the accuracy of modern image classifiers. However, current data augmentation implementations are manually designed. In this paper, we describe a simple procedure called AutoAugment to automatically search for improved data augmentation policies. In our implementation, we have designed a search space where a policy consists of many sub-policies, one of which is randomly chosen for each image in each mini-batch. A sub-policy consists of two operations, each operation being an image processing function such as translation, rotation, or shearing, and the probabilities and magnitudes with which the functions are applied. We use a search algorithm to find the best policy such that the neural network yields the highest validation accuracy on a target dataset. Our method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, SVHN, and ImageNet (without additional data). On ImageNet, we attain a Top-1 accuracy of 83.5% which is 0.4% better than the previous record of 83.1%. On CIFAR-10, we achieve an error rate of 1.5%, which is 0.6% better than the previous state-of-the-art. Augmentation policies we find are transferable between datasets. The policy learned on ImageNet transfers well to achieve significant improvements on other datasets, such as Oxford Flowers, Caltech-101, Oxford-IIT Pets, FGVC Aircraft, and Stanford Cars.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Generalization | VizWiz-Classification | EfficientNet-B6 (autoaug) | Accuracy - All Images | 45.8 | #13 of 90 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VizWiz-Classification | EfficientNet-B6 (autoaug) | Accuracy - Clean Images | 50.7 | #13 of 90 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VizWiz-Classification | EfficientNet-B6 (autoaug) | Accuracy - Corrupted Images | 39.3 | #13 of 90 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VizWiz-Classification | EfficientNet-B5 (autoaug) | Accuracy - All Images | 45.7 | #14 of 90 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VizWiz-Classification | EfficientNet-B5 (autoaug) | Accuracy - Clean Images | 50.2 | #14 of 90 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VizWiz-Classification | EfficientNet-B5 (autoaug) | Accuracy - Corrupted Images | 39.8 | #14 of 90 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VizWiz-Classification | EfficientNet-B7 (autoaug) | Accuracy - All Images | 45 | #16 of 90 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VizWiz-Classification | EfficientNet-B7 (autoaug) | Accuracy - Clean Images | 49.9 | #16 of 90 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VizWiz-Classification | EfficientNet-B7 (autoaug) | Accuracy - Corrupted Images | 39.1 | #16 of 90 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VizWiz-Classification | EfficientNet-B4 (autoaug) | Accuracy - All Images | 44.3 | #18 of 90 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VizWiz-Classification | EfficientNet-B4 (autoaug) | Accuracy - Clean Images | 48.6 | #18 of 90 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VizWiz-Classification | EfficientNet-B4 (autoaug) | Accuracy - Corrupted Images | 38.2 | #18 of 90 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections