Papers › AttnGAN: Fine-Grained Text to Image Generation with Attentional Generative Adversarial Networks

AttnGAN: Fine-Grained Text to Image Generation with Attentional Generative Adversarial Networks

28 Nov 2017CVPR 2018 6arXiv:1711.10485archive 2025-07-28

Tao Xu, Pengchuan Zhang, Qiuyuan Huang, Han Zhang, Zhe Gan, Xiaolei Huang, Xiaodong He

In this paper, we propose an Attentional Generative Adversarial Network (AttnGAN) that allows attention-driven, multi-stage refinement for fine-grained text-to-image generation. With a novel attentional generative network, the AttnGAN can synthesize fine-grained details at different subregions of the image by paying attentions to the relevant words in the natural language description. In addition, a deep attentional multimodal similarity model is proposed to compute a fine-grained image-text matching loss for training the generator. The proposed AttnGAN significantly outperforms the previous state of the art, boosting the best reported inception score by 14.14% on the CUB dataset and 170.25% on the more challenging COCO dataset. A detailed analysis is also performed by visualizing the attention layers of the AttnGAN. It for the first time shows that the layered attentional GAN is able to automatically select the condition at the word level for generating different parts of the image.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1711.10485")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 3 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

20 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.

Maymaher/StackGANv2 mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
Vigneshthanga/stackGAN-v2 mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
aleksey-egorov/attngan mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
alexmotogna/attngan mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
alexmotogna/generatorapi mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
huiyegit/T2I_CL mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
komiya-m/MirrorGAN mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
oxygenlu/ratlip mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
pioneerAlpha/BanglaText2ImageGeneration mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
priscillalui/StackGAN-Stories mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
rightlit/cycle-image-gan-rev mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
roxanasoto/AttGanESRGAN mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
sidward14/Style-AttnGAN mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
taki0112/AttnGAN-Tensorflow mentioned on GitHubtf report
ucsd-ml-arts/ml-art-final-jeffrey mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

3ran · our draft was wrong

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from alexmotogna/attngan. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

conv1x1 alexmotogna/attngan/code/model.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 19379807ba70daaa · report
conv3x3 alexmotogna/attngan/code/model.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · ea864de5c552bc4a · report
upBlock alexmotogna/attngan/code/model.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 0785179f5f580004 · report

Tasks

Image GenerationImage-text matchingText MatchingText to Image GenerationText-to-Image Generation

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Text-to-Image Generation CUB AttnGAN Inception score 4.36 #19 of 20 Archive leaderboard report
Text-to-Image Generation MS-COCO AttnGAN FID 35.49 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Text-to-Image Generation MS-COCO AttnGAN Inception score 25.89 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Text-to-Image Generation MS-COCO AttnGAN SOA-C 25.88 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Text-to-Image Generation Multi-Modal-CelebA-HQ AttnGAN Acc 13.0 #8 of 10 Archive leaderboard report
Text-to-Image Generation Multi-Modal-CelebA-HQ AttnGAN FID 125.98 #8 of 10 Archive leaderboard report
Text-to-Image Generation Multi-Modal-CelebA-HQ AttnGAN LPIPS 0.512 #8 of 10 Archive leaderboard report
Text-to-Image Generation Multi-Modal-CelebA-HQ AttnGAN Real 11.9 #8 of 10 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Convolution

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections