Papers › Attention-Guided Low-Rank Tensor Completion
Attention-Guided Low-Rank Tensor Completion
Truong Thanh Nhat Mai, Edmund Y. Lam, Chul Lee
Low-rank tensor completion (LRTC) aims to recover missing data of high-dimensional structures from a limited set of observed entries. Despite recent significant successes, the original structures of data tensors are still not effectively preserved in LRTC algorithms, yielding less accurate restoration results. Moreover, LRTC algorithms often incur high computational costs, which hinder their applicability. In this work, we propose an attention-guided low-rank tensor completion (AGTC) algorithm, which can faithfully restore the original structures of data tensors using deep unfolding attention-guided tensor factorization. First, we formulate the LRTC task as a robust factorization problem based on low-rank and sparse error assumptions. Low-rank tensor recovery is guided by an attention mechanism to better preserve the structures of the original data. We also develop implicit regularizers to compensate for modeling inaccuracies. Then, we solve the optimization problem by employing an iterative technique. Finally, we design a multistage deep network by unfolding the iterative algorithm, where each stage corresponds to an iteration of the algorithm; at each stage, the optimization variables and regularizers are updated by closed-form solutions and learned deep networks, respectively. Experimental results for high dynamic range imaging and hyperspectral image restoration show that the proposed algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections