Papers › AtomProNet: Data flow to and from machine learning interatomic potentials in materials science
AtomProNet: Data flow to and from machine learning interatomic potentials in materials science
Musanna Galib, Mewael Isiet, Mauricio Ponga
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
As the atomistic simulations of materials science move from traditional potentials to machine learning interatomic potential (MLIP), the field is entering the second phase focused on discovering and explaining new material phenomena. While MLIP development relies on curated data and flexible datasets from ab-initio simulations, transitioning seamlessly between ab-initio workflows and MLIP frameworks remains challenging. A global survey was conducted to understand the current standing (progress and bottleneck) of the machine learning-guided materials science research. The survey responses have been implemented to design an open-source software to reduce the access barriers of MLIP models for the global scientific community. Here, we present AtomProNet, an open-source Python package that automates obtaining atomic structures, prepares and submits ab-initio jobs, and efficiently collects batch-processed data for streamlined neural network (NN) training. Finally, we compared empirical and start-of-the-art machine learning potential, showing the practicality of using MLIPs based on computational time and resources.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections