Papers › Scalable Video Object Segmentation with Identification Mechanism

Scalable Video Object Segmentation with Identification Mechanism

22 Mar 2022arXiv:2203.11442archive 2025-07-28

Zongxin Yang, Jiaxu Miao, Yunchao Wei, Wenguan Wang, Xiaohan Wang, Yi Yang

This paper delves into the challenges of achieving scalable and effective multi-object modeling for semi-supervised Video Object Segmentation (VOS). Previous VOS methods decode features with a single positive object, limiting the learning of multi-object representation as they must match and segment each target separately under multi-object scenarios. Additionally, earlier techniques catered to specific application objectives and lacked the flexibility to fulfill different speed-accuracy requirements. To address these problems, we present two innovative approaches, Associating Objects with Transformers (AOT) and Associating Objects with Scalable Transformers (AOST). In pursuing effective multi-object modeling, AOT introduces the IDentification (ID) mechanism to allocate each object a unique identity. This approach enables the network to model the associations among all objects simultaneously, thus facilitating the tracking and segmentation of objects in a single network pass. To address the challenge of inflexible deployment, AOST further integrates scalable long short-term transformers that incorporate scalable supervision and layer-wise ID-based attention. This enables online architecture scalability in VOS for the first time and overcomes ID embeddings' representation limitations. Given the absence of a benchmark for VOS involving densely multi-object annotations, we propose a challenging Video Object Segmentation in the Wild (VOSW) benchmark to validate our approaches. We evaluated various AOT and AOST variants using extensive experiments across VOSW and five commonly used VOS benchmarks, including YouTube-VOS 2018 & 2019 Val, DAVIS-2017 Val & Test, and DAVIS-2016. Our approaches surpass the state-of-the-art competitors and display exceptional efficiency and scalability consistently across all six benchmarks. Project page: https://github.com/yoxu515/aot-benchmark.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

yoxu515/aot-benchmark officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchBSD-3-Clause report
z-x-yang/AOT officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpaddleBSD-3-Clause report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ObjectSegmentationSemantic SegmentationSemi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationVideo Object SegmentationVideo Semantic Segmentation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOTv2-L (MS) F-measure (Mean) 94.4 #3 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOTv2-L (MS) J&F 93.0 #3 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOTv2-L (MS) Jaccard (Mean) 91.6 #3 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOTv2-L (MS) Speed (FPS) 1.3 #3 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOST (L'=3, MS) F-measure (Mean) 94.5 #4 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOST (L'=3, MS) J&F 93.0 #4 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOST (L'=3, MS) Jaccard (Mean) 91.5 #4 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOST (L'=3, MS) Speed (FPS) 1.3 #4 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOTv2-L F-measure (Mean) 94.1 #7 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOTv2-L J&F 92.4 #7 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOTv2-L Jaccard (Mean) 90.6 #7 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOTv2-L Speed (FPS) 12.0 #7 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOST (L'=3) F-measure (Mean) 94.2 #8 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOST (L'=3) J&F 92.4 #8 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOST (L'=3) Jaccard (Mean) 90.5 #8 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 SwinB-AOST (L'=3) Speed (FPS) 12.0 #8 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 R50-AOST (L'=3) F-measure (Mean) 93.6 #10 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 R50-AOST (L'=3) J&F 92.1 #10 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 R50-AOST (L'=3) Jaccard (Mean) 90.6 #10 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 R50-AOST (L'=3) Speed (FPS) 17.5 #10 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 R50-AOST (L'=2) F-measure (Mean) 93.4 #14 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 R50-AOST (L'=2) J&F 92.0 #14 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 R50-AOST (L'=2) Jaccard (Mean) 90.5 #14 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 R50-AOST (L'=2) Speed (FPS) 24.3 #14 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 R50-AOST (L'=1) F-measure (Mean) 90.9 #30 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 R50-AOST (L'=1) J&F 90.3 #30 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 R50-AOST (L'=1) Jaccard (Mean) 89.6 #30 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2016 R50-AOST (L'=1) Speed (FPS) 37.4 #30 of 78 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) SwinB-AOST (L'=3, MS) F-measure (Mean) 88.5 #4 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) SwinB-AOST (L'=3, MS) FPS 1.3 #4 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) SwinB-AOST (L'=3, MS) J&F 84.7 #4 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) SwinB-AOST (L'=3, MS) Jaccard (Mean) 80.9 #4 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) SwinB-AOTv2-L F-measure (Mean) 87.9 #5 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) SwinB-AOTv2-L FPS 1.3 #5 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) SwinB-AOTv2-L J&F 84.5 #5 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) SwinB-AOTv2-L Jaccard (Mean) 81.0 #5 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) SwinB-AOST (L'=3) F-measure (Mean) 86.6 #11 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) SwinB-AOST (L'=3) FPS 12.0 #11 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) SwinB-AOST (L'=3) J&F 82.7 #11 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) SwinB-AOST (L'=3) Jaccard (Mean) 78.8 #11 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) R50-AOST (L'=3) F-measure (Mean) 83.6 #20 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) R50-AOST (L'=3) FPS 17.5 #20 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) R50-AOST (L'=3) J&F 79.9 #20 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) R50-AOST (L'=3) Jaccard (Mean) 76.2 #20 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) R50-AOST (L'=2) F-measure (Mean) 81.7 #26 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) R50-AOST (L'=2) FPS 24.3 #26 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) R50-AOST (L'=2) J&F 78.1 #26 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) R50-AOST (L'=2) Jaccard (Mean) 74.5 #26 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOTv2-L (MS) F-measure (Mean) 89.8 #13 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOTv2-L (MS) J&F 87.0 #13 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOTv2-L (MS) Jaccard (Mean) 84.2 #13 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOTv2-L (MS) Params(M) 65.6 #13 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOTv2-L (MS) Speed (FPS) 1.3 #13 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOST (L'=3, MS) F-measure (Mean) 89.5 #14 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOST (L'=3, MS) J&F 86.7 #14 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOST (L'=3, MS) Jaccard (Mean) 83.8 #14 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOST (L'=3, MS) Params(M) 65.6 #14 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOST (L'=3, MS) Speed (FPS) 1.3 #14 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOTv2-L F-measure (Mean) 89.4 #15 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOTv2-L J&F 86.3 #15 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOTv2-L Jaccard (Mean) 83.1 #15 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOTv2-L Params(M) 65.6 #15 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) SwinB-AOTv2-L Speed (FPS) 12.0 #15 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=3) F-measure (Mean) 88.5 #19 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=3) J&F 85.6 #19 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=3) Jaccard (Mean) 82.6 #19 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=3) Params(M) 15.4 #19 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=3) Speed (FPS) 17.5 #19 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=2) F-measure (Mean) 88.0 #22 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=2) J&F 85.3 #22 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=2) Jaccard (Mean) 82.5 #22 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=2) Params(M) 13.9 #22 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=2) Speed (FPS) 24.3 #22 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=1) F-measure (Mean) 86.1 #33 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=1) J&F 83.7 #33 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=1) Jaccard (Mean) 81.2 #33 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=1) Params(M) 12.5 #33 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation DAVIS 2017 (val) R50-AOST (L'=1) Speed (FPS) 37.4 #33 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames, MS) F-Measure (Seen) 90.7 #4 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames, MS) F-Measure (Unseen) 88.9 #4 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames, MS) Jaccard (Seen) 85.6 #4 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames, MS) Jaccard (Unseen) 80.7 #4 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames, MS) Overall 86.5 #4 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames, MS) Params(M) 65.6 #4 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames, MS) Speed (FPS) 0.7 #4 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames) F-Measure (Seen) 90.1 #8 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames) F-Measure (Unseen) 88.2 #8 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames) Jaccard (Unseen) 79.6 #8 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames) Overall 85.8 #8 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames) Speed (FPS) 5.1 #8 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOTv2-L (all frames) F-Measure (Seen) 90.2 #11 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOTv2-L (all frames) F-Measure (Unseen) 87.3 #11 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOTv2-L (all frames) Jaccard (Seen) 85.1 #11 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOTv2-L (all frames) Jaccard (Unseen) 78.9 #11 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOTv2-L (all frames) Overall 85.4 #11 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOTv2-L (all frames) Params(M) 15.1 #11 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOTv2-L (all frames) Speed (FPS) 6.3 #11 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=3) F-Measure (Seen) 88.8 #13 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=3) F-Measure (Unseen) 87.9 #13 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=3) Jaccard (Seen) 83.8 #13 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=3) Jaccard (Unseen) 79.3 #13 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=3) Overall 85.0 #13 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=3) Params(M) 15.4 #13 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=3) Speed (FPS) 14.9 #13 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=2) F-Measure (Seen) 88.5 #18 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=2) F-Measure (Unseen) 87.2 #18 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=2) Jaccard (Seen) 83.5 #18 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=2) Jaccard (Unseen) 78.8 #18 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=2) Overall 84.5 #18 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=2) Params(M) 13.9 #18 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=2) Speed (FPS) 20.2 #18 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=1) F-Measure (Seen) 86.1 #35 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=1) F-Measure (Unseen) 83.5 #35 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=1) Jaccard (Seen) 81.4 #35 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=1) Jaccard (Unseen) 75.5 #35 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=1) Overall 81.6 #35 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=1) Params(M) 12.5 #35 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2018 R50-AOST (L'=1) Speed (FPS) 30.9 #35 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames, MS) F-Measure (Seen) 90.3 #3 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames, MS) F-Measure (Unseen) 89.1 #3 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames, MS) Jaccard (Seen) 85.5 #3 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames, MS) Jaccard (Unseen) 81.0 #3 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames, MS) Overall 86.5 #3 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames) F-Measure (Seen) 88.9 #9 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames) F-Measure (Unseen) 88.0 #9 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames) Jaccard (Seen) 84.2 #9 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames) Jaccard (Unseen) 79.8 #9 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 SwinB-AOTv2-L (all frames) Overall 85.2 #9 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=3) F-Measure (Seen) 88.7 #11 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=3) F-Measure (Unseen) 87.7 #11 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=3) Jaccard (Seen) 83.8 #11 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=3) Jaccard (Unseen) 79.3 #11 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=3) Overall 84.9 #11 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=2) F-Measure (Seen) 88.0 #15 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=2) F-Measure (Unseen) 87.1 #15 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=2) Jaccard (Seen) 83.3 #15 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=2) Jaccard (Unseen) 78.9 #15 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=2) Overall 84.3 #15 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=1) F-Measure (Seen) 85.6 #20 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=1) F-Measure (Unseen) 83.8 #20 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=1) Jaccard (Seen) 81.0 #20 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=1) Jaccard (Unseen) 754.8 #20 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation YouTube-VOS 2019 R50-AOST (L'=1) Overall 81.5 #20 of 22 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Absolute Position EncodingsAdamAttentionBPEDense ConnectionsDropoutLabel SmoothingLayer NormalizationLinear LayerMulti-Head AttentionPosition-Wise Feed-Forward LayerResidual ConnectionSoftmaxTransformerVOS

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections