Papers › ASR-GLUE: A New Multi-task Benchmark for ASR-Robust Natural Language Understanding
ASR-GLUE: A New Multi-task Benchmark for ASR-Robust Natural Language Understanding
Lingyun Feng, Jianwei Yu, Deng Cai, Songxiang Liu, Haitao Zheng, Yan Wang
Language understanding in speech-based systems have attracted much attention in recent years with the growing demand for voice interface applications. However, the robustness of natural language understanding (NLU) systems to errors introduced by automatic speech recognition (ASR) is under-examined. %To facilitate the research on ASR-robust general language understanding, In this paper, we propose ASR-GLUE benchmark, a new collection of 6 different NLU tasks for evaluating the performance of models under ASR error across 3 different levels of background noise and 6 speakers with various voice characteristics. Based on the proposed benchmark, we systematically investigate the effect of ASR error on NLU tasks in terms of noise intensity, error type and speaker variants. We further purpose two ways, correction-based method and data augmentation-based method to improve robustness of the NLU systems. Extensive experimental results and analysises show that the proposed methods are effective to some extent, but still far from human performance, demonstrating that NLU under ASR error is still very challenging and requires further research.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections