Papers › Shadow Reduction in Ultrasound Imaging Using Differentiable Simulation and Radiance...
Shadow Reduction in Ultrasound Imaging Using Differentiable Simulation and Radiance Field Decomposition
Valentin Bacher, Pak Hei Yeung, Bernhard Kainz, Madeleine K. Wyburd, Nicola K. Dinsdale, Michael Gray, Ana I. L. Namburete
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Acoustic shadows from bone and other highly attenuating tissues obscure clinically important structures in ultrasound. In fetal brain imaging, skull-induced artefacts disproportionately degrade the hemisphere closer to the transducer (proximal), limiting symmetric assessment of the two hemispheres. Existing correction methods require raw scanner data, impose restrictive assumptions on tissue properties, or rely on generative models that may hallucinate anatomy. We present RFlash, a physics-informed post-processing method that decomposes beamformed ultrasound images into explicit attenuation and scatter-intensity maps using a differentiable radiance-field formulation of image formation. Attenuation-adaptive re-rendering then removes the dependence of the signal at each depth on the intervening tissue, equivalent to virtually advancing the transducer into the tissue. Across 1,261 3D fetal brain volumes, 143 real 2D curvilinear abdominal scans, and 1,200 simulated 2D linear-probe liver scans, RFlash reduces shadow-related intensity differences more effectively than classical Hughes-Duck attenuation correction. For a gestational-age model trained on the distal hemisphere (further from the transducer) and applied to the proximal hemisphere, prediction error decreases by 5.1 days (40%) relative to the original images. The estimated attenuation maps also yield shadow-confidence maps that improve random-forest bone-shadow segmentation over the image alone and receive greater SHAP importance than an existing neural confidence-map baseline, suggesting greater physical consistency. RFlash requires neither hardware modification nor access to raw scanner data and supports 2D and 3D acquisitions with linear and curvilinear probes, making it widely applicable allowing clinicians to use our method on their already acquired scanners and images.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology, its page in Syntology's graph. That page lists the repositories linked to the paper, the abstract and the calls for agents.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, on Syntology's MCP service (how to connect):
get_citation_path(paper_1="2609.29373", paper_2="…")with another paper's arXiv id or titleget_concepts_for_paper(arxiv_id="2609.29373")
Code
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.29373, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections