Papers › Neuralized Multi-Wavelet Decomposition for Time Series Classification and Forecasting
Neuralized Multi-Wavelet Decomposition for Time Series Classification and Forecasting
Xiaohan Jiang, Jingyuan Wang, Jiahao Ji, Yongyao Wang, Chen Yang, Junjie Wu
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Time series analysis is fundamental in domains such as finance, healthcare, and meteorology. Real-world time series often exhibit multiscale characteristics shaped by diverse latent factors, resulting in intricate temporal patterns and rich frequency structures. However, existing approaches typically focus on either frequency-domain decomposition or time-domain pattern extraction in isolation, neglecting their joint structure. This decoupled modeling limits representation expressiveness and undermines performance in tasks requiring simultaneous temporal and spectral reasoning. To address this gap, we propose m-WCN, a novel end-to-end deep learning framework that neuralizes multi-wavelet decomposition for joint extraction of temporal patterns and frequency components. By approximating the classical GHM multi-wavelet transform with trainable convolutional operators and enforcing orthogonality constraints, m-WCN produces interpretable multi-resolution representations. Built on this foundation, we introduce two task-specific architectures: TFBC for time series classification, which boosts discriminative features across frequency scales, and FTB for forecasting, which ensembles frequency-aware predictors. Extensive experiments on 64 UCR datasets and seven public forecasting benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Built on the neuralized m-WCN, our TFBC and FTB outperform various baseline models across diverse datasets, achieving average improvements of 19.97% in classification and 19.92% in forecasting tasks.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology, its page in Syntology's graph. That page lists the repositories linked to the paper, the abstract and the calls for agents.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, on Syntology's MCP service (how to connect):
get_citation_path(paper_1="2609.29317", paper_2="…")with another paper's arXiv id or titleget_concepts_for_paper(arxiv_id="2609.29317")
Code
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.29317, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Placed on leaderboards by Syntology Syntology
Syntology's extractor, the model Claude Sonnet 4.5, judged this paper's tables to report on 6 leaderboards (a model's judgement, not a result) and has not placed the paper on any of them: Time Series Forecasting · Electricity (96) (refused by a rule: the table's column header does not name the leaderboard's metric); Time Series Forecasting · ETTh1 (192) Multivariate (refused by a rule: the table's column header does not name the leaderboard's metric); Time Series Forecasting · ETTh1 (336) Multivariate (refused by a rule: the table's column header does not name the leaderboard's metric); Time Series Forecasting · ETTh1 (720) Multivariate (refused by a rule: the table's column header does not name the leaderboard's metric); Time Series Forecasting · ETTh1 (96) Multivariate (refused by a rule: the table's column header does not name the leaderboard's metric); Time Series Forecasting · ETTm2 (96) Multivariate (refused by a rule: the table's column header does not name the leaderboard's metric). What is not shown.
Syntology has checked 8,886 of the 9,662 papers on this site that are newer than the archive (for 3,717 of them no archive leaderboard matched the paper's tables, so there was nothing further to check); 733 were read and have nothing to place (arXiv has no HTML version of the paper, or that version has no tables), 41 could not be read (the extractor's reply could not be parsed), and results from the other 2 appear after they are checked.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections