Papers › FoCal: Frequency-Oriented Cross-Modal Interaction and Spectral Calibration for Aerial...
FoCal: Frequency-Oriented Cross-Modal Interaction and Spectral Calibration for Aerial Visible-Infrared Object Detection
Ben Liang, Chao Sui, Junqi Bai, Yuan Liu, Chunlai Li, Xiubao Sui, Qian Chen
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
In aerial RGB--IR object detection, effectively exploiting complementary information across modalities is critical for robust perception under complex illumination and environmental conditions. Existing multimodal detectors mainly focus on spatial-domain interaction or frequency-specific feature enhancement, while the cross-modal interaction patterns of different frequency components remain insufficiently explored. Moreover, spectral discrepancy itself may contain both useful complementary cues and unreliable modality-specific responses, making indiscriminate frequency fusion suboptimal. To address these issues, we propose FoCal, a frequency-oriented framework for aerial RGB--IR object detection. First, a Frequency-Aware Dual-Domain Calibration (FADC) module is developed to explicitly model frequency-dependent cross-modal interaction. Low-frequency components are collaboratively consolidated into a shared structural consensus, whereas high-frequency components preserve modality-specific information through selective cross-modal exchange. The resulting frequency-aware cues are further transferred to the original feature domain to regulate cross-modal calibration. Second, we introduce a Discrepancy-Guided Spectral Modulation (DGSM) module, which characterizes cross-modal spectral imbalance using confidence-weighted relative amplitude discrepancy and transforms it into a bounded signed gate for adaptive enhancement, preservation, or attenuation of the joint multimodal spectrum. Extensive experiments on DroneVehicle, ESCVehicle, and ATR-UMOD demonstrate the effectiveness of FoCal, yielding mAP₅₀ values of 83.5%, 54.8%, and 64.6%, respectively. Meanwhile, with only 3.0M parameters, FoCal achieves 113.6 FPS while preserving leading detection accuracy, highlighting a favorable accuracy--efficiency trade-off. Code is available at {https://github.com/universeliang/FoCal.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology, its page in Syntology's graph. That page lists the repositories linked to the paper, the abstract and the calls for agents.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, on Syntology's MCP service (how to connect):
get_citation_path(paper_1="2609.29125", paper_2="…")with another paper's arXiv id or titleget_concepts_for_paper(arxiv_id="2609.29125")
Code
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.29125, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Placed on leaderboards by Syntology Syntology
Syntology's extractor, the model Claude Sonnet 4.5, judged this paper's tables to report on 1 leaderboard (a model's judgement, not a result) and has not placed the paper on it: 2D Object Detection · DroneVehicle (refused by a rule: several configurations of the method, and no metric direction to pick one). What is not shown.
Syntology has checked 8,886 of the 9,662 papers on this site that are newer than the archive (for 3,717 of them no archive leaderboard matched the paper's tables, so there was nothing further to check); 733 were read and have nothing to place (arXiv has no HTML version of the paper, or that version has no tables), 41 could not be read (the extractor's reply could not be parsed), and results from the other 2 appear after they are checked.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections