Papers › Pretraining of Medical Visual Encoders Toward Multi-modal Large Language Models

Pretraining of Medical Visual Encoders Toward Multi-modal Large Language Models

20 Sep 2026arXiv:2609.23860added by Syntology

Tianyou Jiang

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) commonly reuse visual encoders pretrained with CLIP, although the features of these ViTs are ultimately consumed by autoregressive LLMs. We refer to this mismatch as the semantic-interface gap and introduce MedMLIP, a framework that pretrains the visual encoder through report generation with a frozen LLM, while employing Local Relational Distillation (LRD) to preserve relationships among visual patches to avoid visual collapse. We pretrain MedMLIP on IU-Xray and Open-PMC-300K and evaluate the resulting encoders on VQA-RAD and SLAKE. Only the ViT is transferred, while the guiding LLM and projector are replaced, allowing us to assess cross-LLM transferability. Our cross-LLM transfer experiments demonstrate the value of pretraining visual encoders for their autoregressive LLM interface while trying to preserve more fine-grained visual information. Code and the pretrained model are available at https://github.com/SkyCol/MedMLIP

PaperPDF

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.

Code

SkyCol/MedMLIP found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.23860, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections