Papers › DNF-SR: Dual-Input and Negative-Aware Feature Fine-Tuning for Real-World Image Super-Resolution

DNF-SR: Dual-Input and Negative-Aware Feature Fine-Tuning for Real-World Image Super-Resolution

14 Sep 2026arXiv:2609.15120added by Syntology

Shuhao Han, Wenjie Liao, Hayden Vance, Hang Dong, Rui Zhang, Chun-Le Guo, Chongyi Li

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Benefiting from the powerful generative priors of diffusion models, diffusion-based real-world image super-resolution (Real-ISR) methods have demonstrated impressive performance.To achieve efficient Real-ISR, several recent works have designed one-step diffusion-based models.Howerver, unmediatedly feeding LR into a diffusion model creates a distributional gap with the model's original input.A straightforward approach to reduce the distribution gap is to introduce noise to the LR latents. However, directly adding noise inevitably corrupts the content of the LR images.In this study, we propose DNF-SR, a Dual-input and Negative-aware Feature fine-tuning method for Real-ISR.Specifically, we use a dual-input strategy that concatenates the original LR image with the noisy LR input and feeds them into a diffusion-based image editing model, ensuring both high-fidelity one-step super-resolution and improved perceptual and content consistency.Additionally, the noise present in the noisy LR input introduces randomness and diversity into the outputs. We exploit this property and propose a post-training optimization method, Negative-aware Feature Fine-Tuning (NF2T), which guides the model toward producing higher-quality results.NF^2T classifies multiple outputs into positive and negative subsets and then defines implicit policy improvement directions in both the image and feature spaces, thereby further enhancing the stability of the optimization.Extensive experiments show that DNF-SR outperforms other methods.Code will be released.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

21 samples harvested; 6 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 15 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 21 of the 21 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from SHH-Han/DNF-SR. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.15120, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections