Papers › HiGFRL: Hierarchical Graph Fusion-Driven Reinforcement Learning for Dependency-Aware...
HiGFRL: Hierarchical Graph Fusion-Driven Reinforcement Learning for Dependency-Aware Task Scheduling in Heterogeneous Cloud
Tiangang Li, Shi Ying, Xiangbo Tian
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Online scheduling of dependency-aware tasks in heterogeneous cloud clusters is a fundamental yet challenging problem due to the complex interplay between DAG topologies and multi-dimensional resource constraints. While DRL has shown promise, existing GNN-based approaches often struggle to efficiently model high-order topological dependencies and suffer from loose coupling between task and resource states, leading to myopic scheduling decisions. To address these limitations, we propose HiGFRL, a Hierarchical Graph Fusion-Driven Reinforcement Learning framework. HiGFRL constructs a novel three-level state representation comprising a Static Hypergraph, a Dynamic Global Graph, and a Local Bipartite Graph to explicitly model the interplay between task dependencies and real-time cluster dynamics. Specifically, we design a fusion-driven dual-network architecture to optimize RL decision-making, where a Context Fusion Allocator integrates local bipartite matching features with fused global context to execute precise task-to-node allocation, and a Global State Evaluator leverages the global dynamic graph representation to accurately estimate expected long-term cumulative reward. Furthermore, we incorporate a topology-prior-guided hybrid reward mechanism that distills static topological priors into the learning process to accelerate convergence. Extensive experiments using real-world Alibaba cluster traces demonstrate that HiGFRL significantly outperforms heuristics and DRL baselines. Specifically, in challenging large-scale high-load scenarios, HiGFRL reduces the Makespan by up to 32.55%, and optimizes the average task flow time and average task wait time by 13.58% and 13.79%, respectively. Experimental results confirm that HiGFRL not only significantly improves cluster throughput but also ensures superior QoS by substantially reducing queuing delays. Code Release:https://github.com/igeng/HiGFRL.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2609.14968")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 1 sample from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
1 sample harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from igeng/HiGFRL. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
d60f26c821478e2f · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.14968, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections