Papers › A Building as a Repository: KIR, a Typed Intermediate Representation for...
A Building as a Repository: KIR, a Typed Intermediate Representation for Agent-Authored Building Information Models
Dmitry Kuklev
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Autonomous agents that author building information models need more than access to a host API. They need a representation of what they intended, what a compiler decided on their behalf, what was refused, what was observed after execution and what remains unknown. We present KIR, a typed intermediate representation in which a building is authored as a program held in a versioned repository and lowered to host applications as build targets. KIR is organised around seven ways in which a generator writing into a stateful, partially observable host goes silently wrong, and gives each a representation in data: ambiguous selectors become typed refusals with candidates; defaults keep their provenance; obligations that will not be checked are named before execution; vacuous witnesses are rejected statically; a lost transaction response becomes the state UNCONFIRMED with a verify-before-retry rule; the reverse path obeys a census invariant; and decisions are bound by digest to the state they were made against. On a pinned snapshot with 83 operation contracts and Revit as the only backend, offline experiments refuse 29 of 42 stress-test programs with diagnostic codes and no uncaught exception, name 38 of 377 witness obligations as unwitnessable, admit 31 of 100 combinations of execution, witness and acceptance states under seven stated invariants, and find no vacuous witness in 219 certificate runs; a 60-storey tower is 11,263 characters as KIR against 3,709,235 characters of emitted C#. Native Revit runs are reported from project records and kept separate from reproduced results. A controlled comparison with agents that write host code directly is specified but not yet executed; it is the principal open question.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2609.14578")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 12 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 12 have no recorded run.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 12 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
12 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 12 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 12 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 5vbkgsghhh-hash/kir. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
3066314eae4ce56e · report
ed6ea2f0b1032c41 · report
bf59a41734a93b3e · report
ab292e20d6e2f479 · report
cfaf1170c843529e · report
8178a06bba0d6a52 · report
d923825ef98edef3 · report
49d499ed39de9614 · report
bc5e794b6a0ad71c · report
82dcd280ba695419 · report
acbda702673f9121 · report
10683fdbda2e8c09 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.14578, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections